A last-minute amendment to the House-passed ALERT Act would bar tax collectors from using ADS-B transponder data to identify private jets, potentially costing Texas up to $70.2 million in annual tax revenue.
Original report
www.yahoo.com
Restricting a safety-broadcast dataset from tax enforcement shows how a technical rider on a safety bill can quietly reshape state revenue tools without a standalone policy debate.
A last-minute amendment added to the House-passed ALERT Act would prohibit using Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) transponder data to identify aircraft for revenue collection purposes, including landing fees and state and local tax enforcement, without the owner's permission.

Jim Coon, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association's senior vice president of government affairs and advocacy, said airports and tax collectors could still collect fees but would not be able to use an aircraft collision-avoidance device to do so. Opponents said the provision would block state and local governments from using one of their available tools against aircraft tax evasion, citing Texas as an example where some private jet owners register aircraft in other states, frequently Montana, to avoid property taxes. According to publicly available tax rolls, Texas alone could lose up to $70.2 million in annual tax revenue if the Senate approves the amendment, at a time when multiple counties are pursuing millions of dollars from delinquent aircraft owners.
The bipartisan ALERT Act was introduced in February 2025 in direct response to the January 29, 2025, midair collision between a U.S. Army helicopter and an [American Airlines](/entities/2c7ad8a1335f52e1a02825d740e1afa5) flight near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, in which all 67 people aboard both aircraft were killed. The Senate is expected to take up the bill when Congress returns from recess in September.
The dispute sits at the intersection of two uses for the same data stream: ADS-B was built to prevent midair collisions, and the amendment tests whether a safety mandate can be walled off from other government uses once the data exists. That question recurs whenever a technology adopted for one regulatory purpose becomes useful for an unrelated one, and lawmakers have to decide whether to let the secondary use stand or legislate it away.
State and local tax enforcement against aircraft has relied on registration mismatches, such as owners registering in Montana while basing aircraft in Texas, and ADS-B tracking gave tax collectors an independent way to verify where an aircraft actually operates. Removing that tool without another one to replace it would leave counties dependent on self-reported registration data, the same information owners already have an incentive to misstate.
The Senate's action after Congress returns from recess in September will determine whether the amendment survives in the final bill, and Texas counties already pursuing delinquent aircraft owners are the clearest indicator of what enforcement gap the change would open.
AVI-GO, “Critics say aircraft safety bill provides tax haven for private jet owners”. https://ai.avi-go.com/news/ai-news-center/news-briefs/critics-say-aircraft-safety-bill-provides-tax-haven-for-private-jet-ow-e6aee40cca28b87eaeb62d8e57529791
Figures carry an explicit measurement window — cite the window shown on this page, not the date you retrieved it.