Federal Judge Strikes Down Rubio's Immigrant Visa Freeze Covering 75 Countries, Calls Policy 'Orwellian'

A federal judge vacated Secretary of State Marco Rubio's policy freezing immigrant visas from 75 countries, ruling he exceeded his statutory authority.

Original report
www.foxnews.com

Industry impact

The ruling affects consular processing and immigration case flows rather than business aviation traffic, operators, or aircraft markets tracked in flight-activity data.

U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas, a Biden appointee in Manhattan, struck down the Trump administration's freeze on immigrant visas from 75 countries, ruling that Secretary of State Marco Rubio lacked the legal authority to order denials for applicants otherwise found eligible to enter the United States. Vargas vacated the State Department policy and any visa refusals based solely on it, directing the government to revisit those cases, and wrote in her 61-page opinion that "the Policy is contrary to law and was issued in excess of Secretary Rubio's statutory authority."

The State Department had enacted the policy in January, suspending immigrant visa issuance to nationals of 75 countries across Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East that it deemed at high risk of becoming dependent on public benefits. Although the policy instructed consular officers to review each applicant individually, Vargas found that even applicants who passed review and overcame public-charge concerns were still refused solely for coming from one of the 75 countries, writing that "the outcome is predetermined. The visa will be refused." She said the directive effectively imposed a nationality-based ban on nearly 40% of the world's countries and sidelined the consular officers Congress charged with deciding eligibility.

The administration argued the refusals were lawful because officers issued them under Section 221(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, but Vargas rejected that reasoning, calling it "an exercise in Orwellian logic," and found the policy violated the Act's bar on nationality-based discrimination in visa issuance. The ruling does not invalidate visa denials based on other independent grounds of ineligibility, but it wipes out refusals based solely on the 75-country freeze and returns those cases to the government for further proceedings. The lawsuit was brought by the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, African Communities Together, five prospective employment-based immigrants, and six U.S. citizens seeking to bring family members to the country.